Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;177:177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.037

Table 4.

APISE attitudes to alcohol control policies.

Group A Meana
Group A factor loadingsb
Group B factor loadingsb PCA 1
Group B factor loadingsb PCA 2
Restricting availability Provision of health information and treatment services Pricing Reducing anti-social behaviours, harms, and underage sales Pricing Greater law enforcement
Restricting availability 3.12
 Restrictions on numbers of places selling alcohol in your community 0.763c 0.086
 Earlier closing times for buying alcohol from off-licenses and supermarkets 0.775 0.088
 An increase in the price of alcohol 0.777 0.186
 Pricing based on alcohol strength so that the stronger a drink is the more it costs 0.608 0.306
Provision of health information and treatment services 4.04
 Labels on alcohol products warning of the harms of alcohol 0.242 0.721
 Public information campaigns to raise awareness of harms from alcohol 0.220 0.785
 More treatment services to help dependent drinkers 0.023 0.693
Chronbach's alpha 0.748 0.622
Group B
Pricing 3.12
 An increase in the price of alcohol 0.815 −0.010 0.869 0.038
 Pricing based on alcohol strength so that the stronger a drink is the more it costs 0.789 0.047 0.850 0.119
Reducing anti-social behaviours (ASB), harm, and under age sales 4.32
 Greater enforcement of laws on under-age sales 0.102 0.790 0.114 0.833
 Reducing the drink driving limit 0.304 0.112
 Doctors or health professionals asking patients about their drinking habits 0.496 0.145
 A complete ban on drinking on public transport 0.397 0.434
 More police patrolling streets when bars and nightclubs close 0.051 0.839 0.039 0.853
Chronbach's alpha 0.661 0.454 0.661 0.609
a

The mean lies on a scale of 1 strongly oppose; 2 oppose; 3 neither support nor oppose; 4 support; 5 strongly support.

b

Factor loadings are from principal component analysis using Varimax rotation. The eigenvalues and percent variance explained by two factors restricting availability and provision of health information and treatment services in Group A were, respectively; 2.88, 41.11%; 1.15, 16.38%. In the first PCA for Group B “PCA 1” for pricing and reducing anti-social behaviours, harms, and underage sales; 2.12, 30.30%; 1.23, 17.54%. In the second PCA for Group B “PCA 2” for pricing and greater law enforcement; 1.73, 43.21%; 1.20, 30.05%.

c

Loadings greater than 0.5 marked in bold.