Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Feb;10(2):e003132. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003132

Table 2.

Intervention and sustained effects on nurses' knowledge, quality of care, and patient outcomes.

Outcome Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 Intervention Effects* Sustained Intervention Effect
G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 Time 1 to Time 2 in G1 Time 2 to Time 3 in G2 Time 2 to Time 3 in G1
1. Nurses’ Knowledge (N = 7,329 test scores from 3,013 unique nurses)
Mean Test Scores 47.2 49.2 49.4 70.2 71.0 59.4 .0002 .0002 <.0001
2. Quality of Care (N = 4,587 patients)
Accurate Electrode Placement
    Right arm 83% 87% 82% 90% 91% 94% .1185 .0002 .9884
    Left arm 76% 85% 80% 89% 90% 97% .0880 .0002 .9463
    Left leg 71% 75% 81% 89% 93% 92% .0002 .0002 .9499
    V lead 28% 20% 38% 59% 62% 65% .0002 .0002 .9508
Accurate Rhythm Interpretation 95% 82% 82% 97% 98% 94% .0114 .0168 .1350
Cardiac Arrest Events
    Cardiac Arrest 0.56% 1.20% 1.29% 0% 0.32% 0.72% -- -- --
    Initiated by Arrhythmia 0.45% 1.09% 1.16% 0% 0.16% 0.14% -- -- --
Appropriate Monitoring – Telemetry Units Only 68% 66% 59% 70% 72% 70% .0002 .0002 .5184
ST-segment Monitoring when Indicated 26% 56% 44% 67% 45% 75% .0608 .0176 .7105
QTc Measurement when Indicated 28% 13% 34% 51% 35% 45% .0002 .9999 .0034
3. Patient Outcomes (N = 95,884 admissions of 84,392 patients)
Mortality – limited to patients discharged from PULSE unit: N = 65,699 2.8% 2.7% 1.9% 2.7% 2.4% 3.1% .6684 .1602 .0626
In-Hospital MI 3.1% 2.4% 2.9% 1.9% 2.3% 1.5% .0136 .0160 .9993
Not Survive Cardiac Arrest Event (N = 218) 47.9% 21.1% 32.0% 22.7% 22.6% 25.0% .9999 .8440 .4230

G1, indicates Group 1; G2, Group 2; MI, myocardial infarction.

*

Adjusted p-values for Bonferroni correction in two simultaneous tests to reject a null hypothesis of no change (two-sided test)

p-values to reject a null hypothesis of no change or improved (one-sided test)