Table 5. Considerations when performing RNA sequencing from postmortem tissues.
Factora | Examples | Potential Effect on RNA Yield, Quality or Dataa |
---|---|---|
Ultimate Cause of Death of Patient | Sepsis, Prolonged Hypotension | Lower RNA yield and quality of the affected tissues |
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Stroke | Minimal effect | |
Postmortem Interval | Prolonged | Lower RNA yield and quality that is tissue type dependent |
Postmortem Refrigeration | Immediate delivery of patient to morgue after death | Can negate effects of prolonged postmortem interval |
Tissue type | Normal tissue | RNA yields and quality are tissue type dependent and related to cause of death and PMI |
Cancer tissue | RNA yields and quality may not be tissue type dependent and related to extent of necrosis or autolysis in the sample | |
Tissue storage | Prolonged storage (e.g. >10 years) | Lower RNA yields |
Tissue handling | Multiple freeze/thaw cycles | Lower RNA quality |
Prolongation between death and tissue processing | Lower RNA quality | |
Prolongation between time of processing of different samples during autopsy | Potential intrapatient variability in RNA quality | |
RNA handling | Multiple freeze/thaw cycles | Lower RIN values |
Method of RNA Extraction | RNeasy mini plus kit | RNA > 200 bp |
Method of Library Preparation | PolyA enrichment (requires relatively high quality RNA (RIN > 5) | Higher transcriptome coverage |
Ribosomal depletion (best for degraded RNA) | Lower transcriptome coverage |
These potential effects are based on the assumption that all other factors for the patient and tissues are optimal. Should more than one adverse factor exist an even greater loss of RNA yield or quality could be expected.