Table 3. Post-progression therapy for 13 patients treated following clinical trial completion.
| Study Number | CIMP Status | Post-Progression Therapy | Time from Azacitdine study completion to next treatment (days) | Best Response | Time to progression (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | CIMP-High | 5-FU + Oxaliplatin + Bevacizumab + Cetuximab | 19 | PD | 61 |
| 21 | CIMP-High | Erlotinib | 1 | PD | 60 |
| 19 | CIMP-High | Irinotecan | 1 | PD | 76 |
| 24 | CIMP-High | Regorafenib | 29 | PD | 46 |
| 25 | CIMP-High | Regorafenib | 22 | PD | 44 |
| 26 | CIMP-High | Regorafenib | 1 | SD | 439 |
| 11 | non-CIMP | AMG 208 (c-MET inhibitor) | 32 | PD | 34 |
| 12 | non-CIMP | Bevacizumab + Lenalidomide | 51 | PD | 55 |
| 7 | non-CIMP | Cetuximab + Erlotinib + Bevacizumab | 52 | SD | 111 |
| 13 | non-CIMP | Erlotinib + Bortezomib | 32 | PD | 60 |
| 14 | non-CIMP | FOLFOX + Cetuximab + Dasatinib | 40 | PD | 60 |
| 6 | non-CIMP | GDC-0449 (hedgehog inhibitor) | 61 | PD | 45 |
| 9 | Unknown | Irinotecan + Bevacizumab + Cetuximab | 26 | PD | 45 |