Table 3. Regression models adjusting for serious offending, son’s impulsive behavior, and socioeconomic status.
| Dependent variable: SRO 27–32 | B | 95% CI B | p | B | 95% CI B | p | B | 95% CI B | p | B | 95% CI B | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Convicted 19–26 | 0.35 | -0.08- | 0.79 | .111 | 0.36 | -0.07- | 0.80 | .102 | 0.35 | -0.81- | 0.79 | .111 | 0.36 | -0.08- | 0.79 | .107 |
| SRO 15–18 | 0.10 | -0.11- | 0.31 | .358 | 0.36 | 0.24- | 0.49 | .001 | 0.67 | 0.24- | 0.50 | .001 | 0.35 | 0.22- | 0.47 | .001 |
| Parental conviction | -0.50 | -0.85- | -0.15 | .005 | -0.21 | -0.57- | 0.16 | .260 | -0.42 | -0.76- | -0.07 | .017 | -0.35 | -0.71- | 0.01 | .058 |
| Parental conviction * offspring conviction | 2.72 | 1.74- | 3.71 | .001 | 2.56 | 1.57- | 3.54 | .001 | 2.57 | 1.60- | 3.54 | .001 | 2.72 | 1.70- | 3.74 | .001 |
| Offspring serious SRO | 0.34 | 0.10- | 0.58 | .005 | ||||||||||||
| Parent serious conviction | -1.11 | -1.68- | -0.55 | .001 | ||||||||||||
| Offspring impulsiveness | 0.39 | -0.09- | 0.87 | .108 | ||||||||||||
| Socioeconomic status | -0.34 | -1.09- | 0.41 | .373 | ||||||||||||
Note SRO: Self-reported offending