Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;7(43):70969–70978. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10450

Table 5. Toxicities comparison between Arm A (standard chemoradiotherapy) and Arm B (standard chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy).

Toxicity/number of patients (%) Arm Aa (N = 65) Arm Bb (n = 71)
Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Gastrointestinal reaction 8 12.3 10 15.4 41 63.1 2 3.1 4 6.1 0 0 20 28.2 43 60.6 2 2.8 6 8.4
Radiation enteritis 39 60 16 24.6 10 15.4 0 0 0 0 20 28.2 43 60.6 8 11.2 0 0 0 0
Radiation cystitis 45 69.2 4 6.2 16 24.6 0 0 0 0 39 54.9 20 28.2 12 16.9 0 0 0 0
Radioepidermitis 30 46.2 27 41.5 8 12.3 0 0 0 0 24 33.8 41 57.7 6 8.5 0 0 0 0
Myelosuppression 12 18.5 19 29.2 26 40 8 12.3 0 0 1 1.4 18 25.4 34 47.9 18 25.3 0 0
a

Arm A consisted of paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy.

b

Arm B consisted of paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy followed by paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy.