Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 10;7(43):71036–71051. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11954

Table 4. Other combination regimens based on targeted therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (with published results).

Agents Stage Patients(n) Therapeutic scheme First or second line Efficacy (combined therapy vs monotherapy) Adverse events (AEs) Ref
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + Sorafenib Phase 2 128 Radiofrequency ablation plus sorafenib (400mg bid) (n = 64) vs radiofrequency ablation alone (n = 64) Both mOS: 161.8 vs 118.6 weeks. The 1-, 2- and 3- year cumulative incidences: 62.8%, 85.4% and 92.7% vs 40.5%, 62.9% and 74.5%. gastrointestinal bleeding, pleural effusion requiring drainage, mild or moderate increase in body temperature. [87]
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + Sorafenib Phase 2 45 Radiofrequency ablation plus sorafenib (400mg bid) (n = 15) vs radiofrequency ablation alone (n = 30) Both RFA-induced ablated area: 46.3 mm ± 10.3 and 33.0 mm ± 6.9 vs 32.9 mm ± 7.6 and 25.6 mm ± 5.7. serum asparatate aminotransferase concentration transient increases, handfoot skin reaction. [116]
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + Sorafenib Phase 2 62 Radiofrequency ablation plus sorafenib (400mg bid) (n = 30) vs radiofrequency ablation alone (n = 32) First line recurrent rate: 56.7% vs 87.5%; mTTP: 17.0 vs 6.1 months; hand-foot skin reactions, diarrhea, fatigue, alopecia and hypertension. [86]