Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;7(46):75648–75658. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12315

Table 2. Cox regression analysis of parameters potentially influencing cancer-specific survival and cancer-free survival in 114 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Parameters Cancer-specific survival Cancer-free survival
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Univariate Cox regression analysis
 Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65) 1.027 0.992-1.064 0.131 1.031 0.997-1.066 0.077
 Sex (male vs. female) 0.641 0.265-1.551 0.324 0.707 0.294-1.698 0.438
 Tumor stage (T2-T4 vs. Tis-T1) 1.616 0.735-3.552 0.232 1.375 0.671-2.820 0.384
 Tumor grade (high vs. low) 2.458 0.335-18.053 0.377 1.331 0.318-5.565 0.695
 Lymphatic invasion (yes vs. no) 3.493 1.678-7.271 0.001 3.137 1.523-6.460 0.002
 Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no) 3.119 1.533-6.347 0.002 2.768 1.376-5.565 0.004
 IPO11 expression (high vs. low) 3.891 1.515-9.992 0.005 3.537 1.487-8.415 0.004
Multivariate Cox regression analysis*
 Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65) - - - 1.035 0.999-1.072 0.056
 Lymphatic invasion (yes vs. no) 2.039 0.803-5.179 0.134 1.942 0.820-4.598 0.131
 Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no) 1.621 0.654-4.017 0.297 1.682 0.724-3.909 0.227
 IPO11 expression (high vs. low) 3.191 1.222-8.335 0.018 2.972 1.235-7.150 0.015

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

*

multivariate analysis of cancer-specific and cancer-free survival included only those parameters with a P value of ≤0.10 in univariate analysis.