Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 23;96:262–273. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.024

Table 5.

Simple Pearson’s correlation results for ERP Context effect (Animate vs. Inanimate critical words) and behavioral Measures (Vocabulary, Listening Span, AX-CPT D-prime). Note that larger N400 Context effects are reflected by more negative values.

Control Participants
(N=23)		 N400 Context
Effect		 Vocabulary Listening
Span		 D-prime
N400 Context Effect
Vocabulary −.48*
Listening Span −.226 .53**
D-prime −.435* .314 .361^
Participants with
Schizophrenia (N=26)		 N400 Context
Effect		 Vocabulary Listening
Span		 D-prime
N400 Context Effect
Vocabulary −.339^
Listening Span −.95 .451*
D-prime −.12 .21 .293
^

p<.1

*

p<.05

**

p<.01