Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 2;38(4):1914–1932. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23493

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Flattened z‐statistic display of regions in the full sample that demonstrated a significant association between BIO > SCRAM response and age, for (A) the full sample of TD adults and children, and (B) the full sample of adults and children with ASD. β‐values for the BIO > SCRAM contrast were extracted from regions of interest (boxed) and plotted against age, with fit lines and 95% confidence intervals estimated separately for each group. Below, flattened z‐statistic displays of regions that demonstrated a significant association between age and the BIO > SCRAM × RpSTS psychophysiological interaction (PPI), within the full sample of TD adults and children (C) and the full sample of adults and children with ASD (D). Weighted β‐values for the PPI regressor were extracted from regions of interest (boxed) and plotted against age. [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]