Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;8:348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348

Table 7.

Sample composition and subscale scores for a range of papers using the BRSQ.

References Sample AM EX IJ ID IG IM
Lonsdale et al., 2008* 343 New Zealand athletes 2.33 (1.36) 2.03 (1.21) 2.71 (1.60) 5.52 (1.10) 5.55 (1.06) 6.14 (0.92)
Assor et al., 2009** 192/9 Belgian students from top sport schools 1.85 (0.88) 2.06 (0.82) App: 3.55 (0.94); Av: 2.37 (1.01) 4.07 (0.61) 4.27 (0.58) 4.43 (0.54)
Lonsdale and Hodge, 2011* 181 New Zealand athletes 2.26 (1.28) 1.91 (1.12) 2.61 (1.46) 5.71 (1.07) 5.55 (1.14) 6.13 (1.00)
Holmberg and Sheridan, 2013* 598 US college athletes 2.47 (1.45) 2.59 (1.49) 3.35 (1.72) 5.75 (1.15) 5.50 (1.18) 6.01 (1.14)
Viladrich et al., 2013*** 7,769 European youth soccer players 1.75 (1.16) 1.89 (1.23) 2.58 (1.45) 4.10 (1.03) 4.48 (0.88)
Hancox et al., 2015* 1212 UK dancers 2.09 (1.55) 1.80 (1.35) 2.58 (1.86) 5.38 (1.49) 5.46 (1.47) 6.38 (0.92)
*

BRSQ-6 (24 items);

**

28-item version (items added for approach/avoidance introjected regulation);

***

20-item version (no integrated regulation); AM, amotivation; EX, external regulation; IJ, introjected regulation; ID, identified regulation; IG, integrated regulation; IM, intrinsic motivation; App, approach; Av, avoidance; values are mean (standard deviation).