Table 7.
Sample composition and subscale scores for a range of papers using the BRSQ.
| References | Sample | AM | EX | IJ | ID | IG | IM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lonsdale et al., 2008* | 343 New Zealand athletes | 2.33 (1.36) | 2.03 (1.21) | 2.71 (1.60) | 5.52 (1.10) | 5.55 (1.06) | 6.14 (0.92) |
| Assor et al., 2009** | 192/9 Belgian students from top sport schools | 1.85 (0.88) | 2.06 (0.82) | App: 3.55 (0.94); Av: 2.37 (1.01) | 4.07 (0.61) | 4.27 (0.58) | 4.43 (0.54) |
| Lonsdale and Hodge, 2011* | 181 New Zealand athletes | 2.26 (1.28) | 1.91 (1.12) | 2.61 (1.46) | 5.71 (1.07) | 5.55 (1.14) | 6.13 (1.00) |
| Holmberg and Sheridan, 2013* | 598 US college athletes | 2.47 (1.45) | 2.59 (1.49) | 3.35 (1.72) | 5.75 (1.15) | 5.50 (1.18) | 6.01 (1.14) |
| Viladrich et al., 2013*** | 7,769 European youth soccer players | 1.75 (1.16) | 1.89 (1.23) | 2.58 (1.45) | 4.10 (1.03) | – | 4.48 (0.88) |
| Hancox et al., 2015* | 1212 UK dancers | 2.09 (1.55) | 1.80 (1.35) | 2.58 (1.86) | 5.38 (1.49) | 5.46 (1.47) | 6.38 (0.92) |
BRSQ-6 (24 items);
28-item version (items added for approach/avoidance introjected regulation);
20-item version (no integrated regulation); AM, amotivation; EX, external regulation; IJ, introjected regulation; ID, identified regulation; IG, integrated regulation; IM, intrinsic motivation; App, approach; Av, avoidance; values are mean (standard deviation).