Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 22;19(2):e45. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6948

Table 3.

Indexes of change in general practitioners’ self-assessed communicationa by study group.

Scale item Groupb Wald χ2c
(P value)
Pairwise comparisons
(P value)d
EL
(n=42)
mean (SE)
A
(n=89)
mean (SE)
C
(n=94)
mean (SE)
EL–C A–C EL–A
Global communication score

.19 (.126) –.44 (.079) –.09 (.074) 34.5
(<.001)
0.28
(.18)
–0.35
(.003)
0.63
(<.001)
1. I greet them in a kind manner.

.05 (.193) –.21 (.101) .06 (.110) 4.9
(.18)
–0.01
(>.99)
–0.28
(.19)
0.26
(.69)
2. I discuss with them the reason for a visit.

.02 (.180) –.23 (.117) –.31 (.121) 10.2
(.02)
0.33
(.38)
0.08
(>.99)
0.25
(.74)
3. I listen to them carefully.

.17 (.190) –.34 (.094) –.12 (.096) 15.1
(.002)
0.28
(.55)
–0.22
(.31)
0.50
(.053)
4. I show understanding of their problems.

.02 (.163) –.42 (.109) –.15 (.097) 16.9
(.001)
0.17
(>.99)
–0.27
(.20)
0.44
(.08)
5. I make sure I understood them correctly.

.14 (.211) –.35 (.127) .07 (.134) 8.3
(.04)
0.07
(>.99)
–0.42
(.07)
0.49
(.14)
6. I encourage them to ask questions.

.62 (.286) –.18 (.165) .04 (.168) 5.9
(.11)
0.58
(.25)
–0.22
(>.99)
0.80
(.046)
7. I answer all their questions.

–.07 (.163) –.47 (.114) –.42 (.120) 29.5
(<.001)
0.34
(.27)
–0.06
(>.99)
0.40
(.13)
8. I make sure they understood me correctly.

.07 (.166) –.63 (.126) –.13 (.125) 26.4
(<.001)
0.20
(>.99)
–0.50
(.01)
0.70
(.002)
9. I use language they can understand.

.00 (.135) –.56 (.100) –.11 (.108) 32.3
(<.001)
0.10
(>.99)
–0.48
(.006)
0.56
(.002)
10. I summarize topics we discussed.

.21 (.204) –.47 (.133) –.15 (.131) 15.0
(.002)
0.36
(.40)
–0.32
(.25)
0.67
(.01)
11. I inform them about the examination.

.07 (.229) –.27 (.135) .02 (.165) 4.1
(.25)
0.05
(>.99)
–0.29
(.52)
0.34
(.60)
12. I care about their comfort during the examination.

.21 (.181) –.52 (.101) –.28 (.125) 32.0
(<.001)
0.49
(.08)
–0.24
(.41)
0.73
(.001)
13. I provide as much time as they need for each part of the visit.

.21 (.281) –.51 (.183) –.15 (.165) 9.0
(.03)
0.36
(.80)
–0.35
(.45)
0.72
(.10)
14. I explain treatment options available in their situation.

.36 (.220) –.38 (.126) –.13 (.109) 13.3
(.004)
0.48
(.15)
–0.25
(.38)
0.74
(.01)
15. I explain why they should comply with the recommendations.

.14 (.174) –.40 (.109) –.14 (.107) 16.2
(.001)
0.28
(.50)
–0.27
(.24)
0.55
(.02)
16. I make sure they’ll be able to comply with the recommendations.

.02 (.167) –.40 (.134) .11 (.130) 9.7
(.02)
–0.08
(>.99)
–0.51
(.02)
0.43
(.14)
17. I write down the main recommendations for them.

–.02 (.145) –.43 (.103) –.13 (.088) 19.4
(<.001)
0.10
(>.99)
–0.30
(.08)
0.40
(.07)
18. I discuss the plan of further treatment.

.29 (.182) –.40 (.109) –.06 (.114) 16.6
(.002)
0.35
(.31)
–0.34
(.09)
0.69
(.003)
19. I briefly summarize the entire visit.

.36 (.222) –.46 (.140) .05 (.148) 13.5
(.004)
0.30
(.77)
–0.51
(.04)
0.82
(.006)
20. I encourage them to participate in making decisions.

.64 (.164) –.43 (.148) .05 (.138) 23.8
(<.001)
0.59
(.02)
–0.48
(.053)
1.07
(<.001)
21. I give the opportunity to express their opinion.

.62 (.168) –.48 (.145) –.10 (.132) 25.2
(<.001)
0.71
(.002)
–0.38
(.14)
1.10
(<.001)
22. I take their opinion into account in making decisions.

.38 (.178) –.66 (.146) .11 (.145) 25.9
(<.001)
0.25
(.69)
–0.77
(.001)
1.04
(<.001)
23. I create an atmosphere that allows them to discuss intimate issues freely.

.21 (.163) –.48 (.131) .02 (.127) 16.6
(.001)
0.19
(>.99)
–0.50
(.01)
0.68
(.002)
24. I notice their feelings and accept them.

.07 (.170) –.51 (.106) .03 (.132) 23.2
(<.001)
0.04
(>.99)
–0.54
(.005)
0.58
(.01)
25. I ensure a good atmosphere during the entire visit.

.10 (.183) –.66 (.121) –.23 (.100) 35.8
(<.001)
0.33
(.35)
–0.43
(.02)
0.76
(.002)
26. I win their trust.

.07 (.156) –.53 (.119) –.21 (.116) 23.2
(<.001)
0.28
(.43)
–0.31
(.18)
0.60
(.007)

aAssessed by the Promoting Active Aging Communication Scale-Doctors (PRACTA-CS-D) in response to questions about general practitioners’ usual behavior with their older patients (≥65 years).

bStudy groups were e-learning (EL), pdf article (A), and control (C).

cWald chi-square test of the overall model.

dPairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction.