Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;7:44152. doi: 10.1038/srep44152

Table 2. Model selection results using Akaike Information Criteria (AICc) from analyses evaluating how population density of wild pigs was related to biotic and abiotic factors.

Potential Evapotranspiration Large Carnivore Precipitation Wet Season Unvegetated Agriculture Precipitation Dry Season Forest K AICc Δ AICc weight log(L)
* * * * * *   10 237.94 0.00 0.68 −108.33
* * * * * * * 11 240.18 2.24 0.22 −108.32
* * * * *     9 243.00 5.06 0.05 −111.98
* * * * *   * 10 244.40 6.46 0.03 −111.56
* * * *   *   8 246.14 8.20 0.01 −114.65
* * * *   * * 9 248.20 10.26 0.00 −114.58
* * *   * *   9 248.25 10.31 0.00 −114.60
* * *   * * * 10 249.14 11.20 0.00 −113.93
* * *   *   * 9 252.95 15.01 0.00 −116.95
* * * *       7 253.93 15.99 0.00 −119.64

A “*” in the covariate columns indicates whether the variable was included in the model. K is the number of variables included in the model. Note that Potential Evapotranspiration and Agriculture include both main and quadratic effects (thus accounting for two parameters for each of these variables). Only the top 10 models are reported. See Supplementary Table S4 for AICc model selection results of all possible variable combinations.