Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;107(4):614–620. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303621

TABLE 4—

Results of Marginalized Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Model Assessing the Effects of Early Head Start (EHS) on Mean Increments in Dental Care Visits: Zero Out Early Childhood Caries Study, North Carolina

Variable Parameter Estimate Model-Based SE Empirical SE OR (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Probability of having an excess dental care visit
 EHS −1.23** 0.22 0.25 0.29 (0.19, 0.46)
 Propensity score 0.03 0.56 0.56 1.03 (0.32, 3.29)
 Needed dental care at baseline −4.98 7.78 11.45 0.01 (0.00, 66 529.45)
 Had a dental care visit at baseline −1.20* 0.45 0.66 0.30 (0.12, 0.77)
 Constant −0.59** 0.20 0.26 0.55 (0.37, 0.84)
Overall mean number of dental care visits
 EHS 0.30** 0.068 0.063 1.35 (1.17, 1.55)
 Propensity score 0.30 0.160 0.160 1.35 (0.98, 1.87)
 Needed dental care at baseline 0.53** 0.040 0.061 1.69 (1.56, 1.84)
 Had a dental care visit at baseline 0.42** 0.089 0.090 1.52 (1.26, 1.83)
 Constant 0.31** 0.092 0.090 1.36 (1.13, 1.65)
Random effects variance components
 Standard deviation of excess zeros intercept 0.69** 0.13 0.014
 Standard deviation of mean model intercept 0.28** 0.061 0.054
 Correlation of random intercepts −0.94** 0.078 0.061
 Overdispersion parameter 0.04 0.019 0.023

Note. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; RR = rate ratio. ORs, RRs, and CIs are based on model empirical standard errors. Models included random effects for each of the 25 EHS program clusters (see Appendix B, available as a supplement to the online version of this article at http://www.ajph.org). Baseline data were collected from 2010–2012; 24-month follow-up data were collected from 2012–2014. The sample size was n = 1178.

*P < .05; **P < .01.