TABLE 2—

Condition Effects on Drug Use and Sex Without a Condom Trajectories for Familias Unidas vs Prevention as Usual, Hispanic Eighth Graders: Miami–Dade County, FL, September 2010–June 2014

	Drug Use vs Non–Drug Use, Slope		Drug-Use Frequency, Slope		Model Fit Indices
Variable	Est. (95% CI)	SE	Est. (95% CI)	SE	Log-Likelihood (df)	AIC/BIC
Drug use					–0.836.25 (18)	1708.50/1991.39
Intercept	0.06 (–0.36, 0.49)	0.22	0.31 (0.16, 0.45)	0.13
Condition (FU vs PAU)	–0.12 (–0.28, 0.51)	0.20	–0.20 (–0.29, –0.10)	0.04
Mean trajectory
Sex without a condom					–726.718 (11)	1475.44/1506.97
Intercept			0.05 (–0.27, 0.84)	0.05
Condition (FU vs PAU)			0.09 (0.02, 0.16)	0.03

Note. AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; CI = confidence interval; Est. = estimation; FU = Familias Unidas; PAU = prevention as usual. Unstandardized coefficients are presented in the table. The zero-inflated growth model was used for drug use whereas the conventional growth curve model was used for sex without a condom. Seven cases were not included in the drug-use analyses because of an invalid response pattern.