Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;107(4):541–549. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303655

TABLE 1—

Doll and Peto’s “The Causes of Cancer” and the Changing Sum of Population Attributable Fractions: 1981 vs 1985

Initial Presentation, 19819(p1256): “Proportions of cancer deaths attributed to various different factors”
Revised Presentation, 198510(p12): “Percentage of all U.S. or U.K. cancer deaths that might be avoidable”
Factor Best Estimate Range of Acceptable Estimates Best Estimate Range of Acceptable Estimates
Tobacco 30 25–40 30 25–40
Alcohol 3 2–4 3 2–4
Diet 35 10–70 35 10–70
Food additives < 1 −5–2 < 1 −5–2
Reproductive and sexual behavior 7 1–13 Sexual behavior: 1 1
Yet-to-be-discovered analogs of reproductive factors: up to 6 0–12
Occupation 4 2–8 4 2–8
Pollution 2 < 1–5 2 1–5
Industrial products < 1 < 1–2 < 1 < 1–2
Medicines and medical procedures 1 0.5–3 1 0.5–3
Geophysical factors 3 2–4 3 2–4
Infection 10? 1–? 10? 1–?
Unknown ? ? ? ?
Total: 200 or morea
a

The 1981 table did not provide a row for “total”; however, the percentages of “best estimates” sum to 97%, not including the unknown “?.” By contrast, the 1985 version of the table stated, “Since once cancer may have two or more causes, the grand total in such a table will probably, when more knowledge is available, greatly exceed 200. (It is merely a coincidence that the suggested figures … happen to add up to about 100.)”10