Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 2;18(2):314. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020314

Table 2.

Embryological results from the couples studied according to the genotype of the males.

Variables Wild Type (GG) Heterozygotic Type (GA) Mutant Type (AA) p Value
Number of cycles 28 72 32
Number of ETs 22 65 30
PRM (%) 39.5 ± 4.1 42.8 ± 2.7 21.06 ± 3.2 <0.05
NPM (%) 12.42 ± 1.9 16.71±1.3 15.75 ± 2.4 NS
IM (%) 43.78 ± 4.4 37.79 ± 2.6 53.81 ± 4.9 <0.05
CoCs 4.7 ± 0.7 5.6 ± 0.4 5.7 ± 0.5 NS
FR (%) 57.64 ± 7.2 61.31 ± 3.3 51.29 ± 4.9 NS
CR (%) 64.89 ± 7.8 82.07 ± 3.7 89.21 ± 4.6 <0.05
CES 17.71 ± 3.3 26.5 ± 2.3 23.43 ± 2.8 NS
MSEQ 5.82 ± 0.7 7.36 ± 0.4 8.12 ± 0.5 <0.05

PRM: progressive motility; NPM: non progressive motility; IM: immotility; CoCs: cumulus oocyte complexs; FR: fertilization rate, CR: cleavage rate, CES: cumulative embryo score, MSEQ: mean score of embryo quality; ET: Embryo Transfer; NS: No significant.