Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;18(2):349. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020349

Table 2.

Published studies on inhaled FGA loxapine in healthy subjects.

Authors Year Study Sample Study Design Number of Subject Study Aims Dose (mg/Day) Main Findings
Spyker et al. 2010 Healthy subjects Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study 50 To determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and tolerability of single doses of inhaled loxapine 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 mg of loxapine or placebo The inhalation of loxapine represented a safe and well-tolerated route for rapidly achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations
Spyker et al. 2014 Healthy subjects randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study 48 To evaluate effects of inhaled loxapine on the QTc interval Inhaled loxapine 10 mg or inhaled placebo No QTc prolongation was observed with the therapeutic dose of inhaled loxapine
Cassella et al. 2015 Healthy subjects randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, crossover, thorough QT study 60 To assessed the effect of two inhaled loxapine doses on cardiac repolarization as measured by QTc interval inhaled loxapine (10 mg) 2 h apart+oral placebo, two doses of inhaled placebo+oral placebo, or two doses of inhaled placebo+oralmoxifloxacin (400 mg; positive control) The two therapeutic doses of inhaled loxapine did not cause threshold QTc prolongation
Spyker et al. 2015 Healthy subjects Randomized, double-blind, crossover study 22 Pharmacodynamic effects and safety of single-dose inhaled loxapine and IM lorazepam in combination versus each agent alone lorazepam 1 mg IM, inhaled loxapine 10 mg, placebo IM (alone or combined) Concomitant administration of inhaled loxapine and lorazepam in healthy volunteers showed no difference in its effect on respiration rate or pulse oximetry (primary endpoints) versus either drug alone