Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;116(5):679–687. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.7

Table 3. Composite lifestyle score and gastric cancer risk by gender, the Singapore Chinese Health Study, 1993–2014.

Characteristics N Cases Person-years HR (95% CI)a
Male (N=27 293)
Composite scores (five factors)        
 0/1/2 4866 103 74 708 1.00 (reference)
 3 9929 159 158 964 0.72 (0.56–0.92)
 4 9543 117 157 918 0.53 (0.40–0.69)
 5 2955 33 49 597 0.46 (0.31–0.69)
Ptrend       <0.001
 PAR (95% CI)       0.50 (0.34–0.63)
Composite Z-scores (five factors)        
 1st Quartile 6823 127 105 697 1.00 (reference)
 2nd Quartile 6824 101 109 148 0.76 (0.58–0.99)
 3rd Quartile 6823 97 112 193 0.74 (0.56–0.96)
 4th Quartile 6823 87 114 148 0.62 (0.47–0.82)
Ptrend       0.001
Female (N=34028)
Composite scores (five factors)        
 0/1/2 1357 19 23 004 1.00 (reference)
 3 10 088 88 175 171 0.67 (0.41–1.09)
 4 15 256 120 269 223 0.52 (0.32–0.84)
 5 7327 52 130 477 0.47 (0.28–0.79)
Ptrend       0.003
 PAR (95% CI)       0.41 (0.18–0.60)
Composite Z-scores (five factors)        
 1st Quartile 8507 85 145 331 1.00 (reference)
 2nd Quartile 8507 66 149 599 0.76 (0.55–1.05)
 3rd Quartile 8507 65 151 211 0.70 (0.50–0.96)
 4th Quartile 8507 63 151 733 0.66 (0.48–0.92)
Ptrend       0.011

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; PAR=population attributable risk.

a

Model adjusted for age at baseline interview (in years), baseline interview year (1993–1995, 1996–1998), father's dialect (Cantonese, Hokkien), and education (no formal education, primary education, ⩾secondary education).