Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;116(5):679–687. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.7

Table 4. Sensitivity analysis for composite lifestyle score and gastric adenocarcinoma risk by length of follow-up, the Singapore Chinese Health Study, 1993–2014.

Follow-up time Cases Person-years HR (95% CI)a
Follow-up ⩽5 years
Composite score (five factors)      
 0/1/2 36 30 149 1.00 (reference)
 3 68 97 487 0.71 (0.47–1.07)
 4 51 121 335 0.44 (0.28–0.68)
 5 15 50 499 0.33 (0.18–0.61)
Ptrend     <0.001
Composite Z-score (five factors)      
 1st Quartile 66 74 552 1.00 (reference)
 2nd Quartile 40 74 837 0.60 (0.41–0.89)
 3rd Quartile 29 75 022 0.43 (0.28–0.66)
 4th Quartile 35 75 058 0.50 (0.33–0.76)
Ptrend     <0.001
Follow-up >5 years
Composite score (five factors)      
 0/1/2 86 67 563 1.00 (reference)
 3 178 236 648 0.71 (0.55–0.92)
 4 187 305 805 0.57 (0.43–0.74)
 5 70 129 575 0.52 (0.38–0.73)
Ptrend     <0.001
Composite Z-score (five factors)      
 1st Quartile 146 176 476 1.00 (reference)
 2nd Quartile 127 183 910 0.83 (0.66–1.06)
 3rd Quartile 133 188 382 0.84 (0.66–1.07)
 4th Quartile 115 190 823 0.70 (0.54–0.89)
Ptrend     0.007

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.

a

Model adjusted for age at baseline interview (in years), baseline interview year (1993–1995, 1996–1998), father's dialect (Cantonese, Hokkien), gender, and education (no formal education, primary education, ⩾secondary education).