Table 1. Rodent species trapped at the different study sites and included in the study.
Study location | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gatow | Tegel | Moabit | Steglitz | Total | |
n = 91 | n = 36 | n = 26 | n = 104 | n = 257 | |
Number | Number | Number | Number | Number | |
Frequencya | Frequencya | Frequencya | Frequencya | Frequency | |
Rodent species | (95% CIb) | (95% CIb) | (95% CIb) | (95% CIb) | (95% CIb) |
A.flavicollis | 33 | 22 | 0/26 | 27/104 | 82/257 |
n = 82 | 36.3 | 61.1 | 0.0 | 26.0 | 31.9 |
(27.1–46.5) | (44.9–75.2) | (0.0–12.9) | (18.5–35.1) | (26.5–37.8) | |
A. sylvaticus | 0 | 0 | 25/26 | 0/104 | 25/257 |
n = 25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 96.2 | 0.0 | 9.2 |
(0.0–4.1) | (0–9.6) | (81.1–99.3) | (0–4.4%) | (6.7–14.0) | |
A. agrarius | 5 | 0 | 0/26 | 73/104 | 78/257 |
n = 78 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 70.2 | 30.4 |
(2.4–12.2) | (0–9.6) | (0.0–12.9) | (60.8–78.1) | (25.1–36.2) | |
M. glareolus | 44 | 14 | 1/26 | 0/104 | 59/257 |
n = 59 | 48.4 | 38.9 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 22.6 |
(38.4–58.5) | (24.8–55.1) | (0.7–18.9%) | (0–4.4%) | 18.2–28.5% | |
M. arvalis | 7 | 0 | 0/26 | 4/104 | 11/257 |
n = 11 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 |
(3.8–15.0) | (0–9.6) | (0–12.9) | (1.5–9.5) | (2.4–4.5) | |
M. agrestis | 2 | 0 | 0/26 | 0/104 | 11/257 |
n = 2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.3% |
(0.6–7.7) | (0–9.6) | (0–12.9%) | (0.0–4.4%) | 2.4–4.5% | |
Total | 91 | 36 | 104/257 | 104/257 | 2/257 |
n = 257 | 35.4 | 14.0 | 40.5% | 40.5% | 0.8% |
(29.8–41.4) | (10.3–18.8) | (34.7–46.6%) | (34.7–46.6%) | 0.2–2.8% |
Values in cells combining study locations with rodent species (Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvaticus, Apodemus agrarius, Myodes glareolus, Microtus arvalis, Microtus agrestis) describe apparent frequency and 95% confidence intervals of rodent species in this particular location. In the “Total” column, the number of rodents trapped in this study location to the total number of rodents trapped. In the row “Total”, the number of rodents trapped from this species is considered in relation to the total number of rodents trapped.
a Frequency at the particular study site
b 95% confidence interval.