Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;12(3):50–65.

Table 3.

Primary care physician perceptions throughout the stages of cancer

Cancer stage Respondents' perceptions (agree) n (%) 95% CI
Peri-diagnosis Cancer-related diagnostic tests NOT done in timely fashion (N = 468) 163 (34.8) (30.7, 39.3)
 MRIs NOT done in a timely fashion 125 (76.7)
 CT scans NOT done in a timely fashion 107 (65.6)
 Biopsy results NOT received in a timely fashion 82 (50.3)
Don't know procedure for referring patients to RCP (N = 461) 179 (38.8) (34.5, 43.4)
 Where to call unclear 110 (61.5)
 What tests to order prior to referral unclear 106 (59.2)
 Who to call unclear 139 (77.7)
Coordination/Access to services for cancer patients needs improvement (N = 439) 211 (48.1) (43.4, 52.7)
Cancer system navigation program is required (N = 460) 371 (80.7) (76.8, 84.0)
 Recommend a Coordinator model* 176 (47.4)
 Recommend an Advisor model§ 48 (12.9)
 Recommend a Shared model 130 (35.0)
 Unsure or recommend other model 17 (4.6)
Active treatment Manage patients' common symptoms related to cancer or its treatment as problems arise (N = 452) 348 (77.0) (72.9, 80.6)
Continue to manage patients' other medical issues (N = 469) 461 (98.3) (96.6, 99.2)
Provide patients with information about their cancer and cancer treatments (N = 461) 262 (56.8) (52.3, 61.3)
Involved with patients in decision-making process about cancer management (N = 458) 257 (56.1) (51.5, 60.6)
Know how to contact a provider within RCP involved in patients' care (N = 459) 345 (75.2) (71.0, 78.9)
Have difficulty reaching RCP providers to discuss patient (N = 457) 83 (18.2) (14.9, 22.0)
Feel inadequately informed by RCP regarding significant changes in patients' health status (N = 454) 99 (21.8) (18.2, 25.8)
Feel inadequately informed by RCP regarding changes in patients' medications or treatments (N = 460) 78 (17.0) (13.8, 20.7)
Feel inadequately informed by RCP regarding next steps in patients' care (N = 460) 87 (18.9) (15.6, 22.8)
Follow-up Encourage cancer patients to follow-up at practice upon completion of cancer treatment (N = 468) 420 (89.7) (86.6, 92.2)
Easy to connect patients back to RCP if recurrence of initial cancer diagnosis is suspected (N = 434) 397 (91.5) (88.4, 93.8)
Feel adequately informed by RCP regarding what is involved in follow-up of cancer patients upon being discharged from oncologist care (N = 461) 362 (78.5) (74.5, 82.0)
Palliative Know who to contact to obtain palliative care services for patients (N = 461) 350 (75.9) (71.8, 79.6)
Refer to publicly funded home care (N = 473) 233 (49.3) (44.8, 53.8)
Refer to palliative care physicians (N = 473) 143 (30.2) (26.3, 34.5)
Refer to hospital palliative care (N = 473) 89 (18.8) (15.5, 22.6)
Refer to residential hospice (N = 473 74 (15.6) (12.6, 19.2)
Refer to palliative care team/network (N = 473) 50 (10.6) (8.1, 13.7)
Main resource used is Myself (N = 473) 31 (6.6) (4.6, 9.2)
RCP responsive to requests for advice (N = 374) 300 (80.2) (75.9, 83.9)
General Overall, felt there is good coordination of care between practice and RCP (N = 452) 389 (86.1) (82.5, 89.0)
In general, satisfied with the way information is exchanged between practice and RCP across trajectory of care (e.g., quality, timeliness, completeness, etc.) (N = 460) 398 (86.5) (83.1, 89.4)
Interested in attending multidisciplinary case conferences on patients (N = 456) 207 (45.4) (40.9, 50.0)
Accessed Cancer Centre's web portals as a source of information (N = 463) 39 (8.4) (6.2, 11.3)
Attended educational sessions to increase knowledge regarding cancer care (N = 469) 304 (64.8) (60.4, 69.0)
Current method of remuneration adequately compensates me for the care I provide to my cancer patients (N = 454) 244 (53.7) (49.1, 58.3)

CI = confidence interval; CT = computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PCP = primary care physicians; RCP = regional cancer program.

*

Coordinator model – navigation program becomes responsible for coordinating appointments and the PCP practices are informed but not responsible for care.

§

Shared model – navigation program helps coordinate patient appointments and the PCP practices coordinate care.

Advisor model – navigation program provides PCPs with advice, and physician practices coordinate care and appointments.