Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2017 Apr;21(4):1059–1069. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1693-x

Table 4.

Regression results for the conditional indirect effect (moderated mediation model)

Explanatory Variablea Consequent
M (Depression)
Y (HRQoLc)
Coeff. SEb p w SE p
HIV stigma a1 0.0889 0.0709 .2109 c1 0.2071 0.1721 .2298
Depression - - - - b1 −0.8079 0.3550 .0237
Social support a2 -−0.1183 0.1289 .3596 c2 0.4352 0.7546 .0433
HIV stigma × Social support a3 0.0011 0.0013 .3978 c3 −0.0029 0.0031 .3538
Depression × Social support - - - - b2 −0.0317 0.0012 .0133
Constant i1 13.0461 7.6204 .0880 i2 94.6678 5.6492 <.0001
R2 = 13.99% R2 = 23.25%
F(10,270) = 4.3912, p <0.001 F(12,268) = 6.7667, p < .001

Conditional indirect effect of HIV stigma on HRQoL at values of the moderator
Mediator Moderator Coeff. Boot SE BootLLCI BootULCI

Depression 30.6889 −0.0987 0.0419 −0.2016 −0.0336
50.5479 −0.1162 0.0341 −0.1975 −0.0552
70.4069 −0.1336 0.0544 −0.2623 −0.0466

Note:

a

Controlling for age, educational status, employment status, length of current incarceration, length of HIV diagnosis, currently taking ART, and current CD4+ count

b

SE: Standard error

c

HRQoL: Health-related quality of life