Table 2.

Association of residential segregation with the Kessler 10 (log-transformed)^*,^†

	Model 1: residential segregation		Model 2: residential segregation and ethnic density		Model 3: residential segregation and poverty		Model 4: residential segregation, ethnic density and poverty
	β (95% CI)	p Value	β (95% CI)	p Value	β (95% CI)	p Value	β (95% CI)	p Value
Dissimilarity index	−0.08 (−0.28 to 0.12)	0.45	−0.07 (−0.29 to 0.14)	0.50	−0.11 (−0.32 to 0.10)	0.30	−0.06 (−0.26 to 0.15)	0.59
Ethnic density			−0.01 (−0.06 to 0.05)	0.83			−0.07 (−0.15 to 0.01)	0.11
Poverty					0.33 (0.14 to 0.52)	0.001	0.38 (0.15 to 0.62)	0.001
Isolation index	−0.13 (−0.22 to −0.03)	0.007	−0.18 (−0.30 to −0.07)	0.002	−0.15 (−0.24 to −0.06)	0.001	−0.14 (−0.26 to −0.03)	0.012
Ethnic density			0.06 (0.01 to 0.11)	0.014			−0.01 (−0.10 to 0.08)	0.84
Poverty					0.35 (0.15 to 0.54)	<0.001	0.36 (0.12 to 0.59)	0.003

^*All models adjusted for age (18–34, 35–49, 50–64, 65+ years), sex, marital status (married, never married, widowed/separated/divorced), education (<12, 12, 13–16, 17+ years) and household poverty (<100% poverty limit, ≥100% poverty limit).

^†Multilevel random-effects models included random effects for metropolitan statistical areas and census tracts.