Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 10;7:43873. doi: 10.1038/srep43873

Table 1. Comparison of instrument settings between three flow cytometers from three centers participated in the study.

Comparison of instrument settings between BD FACS Canto™ II, BD LSRFortessa™ and MACS Quant® Analyzer 10
Fluorochromes Filter settings - Band pass & Long pass filters PMT voltages
BD FACS Canto™ II BD LSR Fortessa™ MACS Quant® Analyzer 10 BD FACS Canto™ II BD LSR Fortessa™ MACS Quant® Analyzer 10
FSC 488/10 488/10 488/10 319 489 328
SSC 488/10 488/10 488/10 462 266 476
FL1 530/30 & 502LP 530/30 & 505LP 525/50 496 484 417
FL2 585/42 & 556LP 575/26 & 550LP 585/40 435 473 416
FL3 780/60 & 735LP 780/60 & 750LP 750LP 540 549 487
FL4 670LP & 655LP 695/40 & 685LP 655–730 507 681 594
FL5 660/20 670/14 & 655LP 655–730 588 484 522
FL6 780/60 & 735LP 780/60 & 750LP 750LP 474 451 579
FL7 450/50 450/50 450/50 375 423 444
FL8 510/50 & 502LP 525/50 & 505LP 525/50 403 453 560

Three flow cytometers (BD FACS Canto™ II, BD LSR Fortessa™ and MACS Quant® Analyzer 10) with compatible optical configuration were used for NK phenotype and NK function FACS panel design and optimization studies. Forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC) and eight fluorescence emission channels (FL1-FL8) were used. Further, their corresponding band pass and long pass (LP) filter settings were compared and the photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltages obtained are mentioned.