Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 10;7:44181. doi: 10.1038/srep44181

Table 3. REML output for (A) models testing effects of 15N concentration (at%; fixed effect) on the lag phase duration (λ, h), maximal growth during exponential phase (μ, d−1) and AUC for well-specific growth curves over 119 h in the test system. Plate was a random effect in each model, and (B) LSD pairwise comparisons. Significant p-values are indicated in bold.

A)
Dependent variable Num df Den df F ratio p-value  
Lag phase, λ 3 8 48.27 <0.000  
Maximal growth rate, μ 4 10 16.17 0.0002  
AUC 4 10 219.04 <0.000  
B)
Dependent variable Treatment groups 2 at% 3.5 at% 10 at% 50 at%
Lag phase, λ 0.37 at% 0.920 0.024 0.359 <0.000
2 at%   0.020 0.411 <0.000
3.5 at%     0.004 <0.000
10 at%       <0.000
Maximal growth rate, μ 0.37 at% 0.433 0.072 0.538 0.001
2 at%   0.261 0.862 0.001
3.5 at%     0.201 <0.000
10 at%       0.001
AUC 0.37 at% 0.001 <0.000 <0.000 <0.000
2 at%   0.001 <0.000 <0.000
3.5 at%     0.031 <0.000
10 at%       <0.000