Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;6(3):508–515. doi: 10.1002/cam4.924

Table 1.

Patients’ characteristics

Group A (%) n = 20 B (%) n = 24 C (%) n = 21 Control (%) n = 21 P
Age (Range) 33 (26–38) 35 (27–40) 36 (26–39) 35 (26–40) 0.98
FIGO staging
Ib1 4 (20.0) 8 (33.3) 6 (28.6) 5 (23.8) 0.77
Ib2 6 (30.0) 9 (37.5) 7 (33.3) 6 (28.6) 0.89
IIa1 5 (25.0) 4 (16.7) 4 (19.0) 5 (23.8) 0.89
IIa2 5 (25.0) 3 (12.5) 4 (19.0) 5 (23.8) 0.71
Histological types
Squamous cell carcinoma 15 (75.0) 18 (75.0) 14 (66.7) 15 (71.4) 0.91
Adenocarcinoma 2 (10.0) 4 (16.7) 6 (28.6) 4 (19.0) 0.49
Adenosquamous carcinoma 3 (15.0) 2 (8.3) 1 (4.8) 2 (9.5) 0.72
Surgical procedures
One ovarian transposition 3 (15.0) 4 (16.7) 3 (14.3) 3 (14.3) 0.99
Ovarian transposition 17 (85.0) 20 (83.3) 18 (85.7) 18 (85.7) 0.99
Concurrent chemotherapy 16 (80.0) 19 (79.0) 17 (81.0) 0 (0.0) 0.99
Pelvic radiation dose 4500–5000 cGy 4500–5000 cGy 4500–5000 cGy 4500–5000 cGy
Ovary limit dose No No V10 < 20% No
Brachytherapy 12 (60.0) 13 (54.2) 11 (52.4) 12 (57.1) 0.93

There is no statistically significant difference at age and clinical staging among four groups (P < 0.05). Because the chemotherapy was not used in control group, we only compared the experimental group combined with chemotherapy.