Table 3.
Multiple linear regression analysis of the relationship between lower limb muscle co-contraction during walking and ΔTMT, adjusted for age.
| Normal Walking | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| ΔTMT (s) | |||
|
| |||
| Co-Contraction (%) | R2 | β | p-val |
|
| |||
| Stride | 0.113 | 0.049 | 0.246 |
| Stance | 0.026 | 0.007 | 0.870 |
| Swing | 0.251 | 0.110 | 0.022 |
|
| |||
| Dual Task Walking | |||
|
| |||
| ΔTMT (s) | |||
|
| |||
| Co-Contraction (%) | R2 | β | p-val |
|
| |||
| Stride | 0.096 | 0.058 | 0.151 |
| Stance | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.582 |
| Swing | 0.266 | 0.121 | 0.010 |
Note: R2 = measures the proportion of variance in the outcome variable explained by the predictor variable; β = magnitude of the slope of the relationship; p-val = probability of whether or not β is significantly different than 0 (p-val < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).