Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gait Posture. 2017 Jan 20;53:110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.01.010

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analyses of the relationships between lower limb muscle co-contraction and ABC, gait speed, and stride, stance, and swing times during normal and dual task walking, adjusted for age.

Normal Walking

ABC (%) Gait Speed (m/s) Stride Time (s) Stance Time (s) Swing Time (s)

Co-Contraction (%) R2 β p-val R2 β p-val R2 β p-val R2 β p-val R2 β p-val
Stride 0.147 −0.394 0.021 0.352 −0.001 0.466 0.140 0.001 0.218 - - - - - -
Stance 0.131 −0.342 0.036 0.349 −0.001 0.573 - - - 0.129 0.0005 0.511 - - -
Swing 0.152 −0.362 0.018 0.361 −0.002 0.273 - - - - - - 0.034 −0.0004 0.256

Dual Task Walking

ABC (%) Gait Speed (m/s) Stride Time (s) Stance Time (s) Swing Time (s)

Co-Contraction (%) R2 β p-val R2 β p-val R2 β p-val R2 β p-val R2 β p-val

Stride 0.170 −0.456 0.010 0.379 −0.004 0.038 0.157 0.003 0.034 - - - - - -
Stance 0.140 −0.374 0.027 0.378 −0.004 0.04 - - - 0.190 0.002 0.08 - - -
Swing 0.151 −0.360 0.018 0.360 −0.003 0.097 - - - - - - 0.030 0.0001 0.821

Note: R2 = measures the proportion of variance in the outcome variable explained by the predictor variable; β = magnitude of the slope of the relationship; p-val = probability of whether or not β is significantly different than 0 (p-val < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).