Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Jul-Aug;32(4):372–382. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000350

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Random effects meta-analysis of relationship between caregiver psychological distress and patient symptoms of HF. Note: Fisher’s Z converts to the metric of Pearson’s r as follows: for HSC summary effect r = 0.136; for BDI summary effect r = −0.105; for CES-D summary effect r = 0.226; for Other Depression summary effect r = 0.073; for Overall summary effect r = 0.060. Egger’s test for bias of small study effects: t = −0.71, p =0.502.