Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 11;17:65. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0447-y

Table 2.

Adjusted fall prevalence among different racial/ethnic groups

Unadjusted Age-adjusted Age-adjusted + comorbiditiesa Age-adjusted + comorbiditiesa + poor health Age-adjusted + comorbiditiesa + poor health + mobility limitation
Outcome: ≥ 1 fall in past year OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Non-Hispanic white Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Black 0.77b 0.80 0.75b 0.76b 0.73b
(0.59–1.00) (0.61–1.04) (0.57–0.99) (0.58–0.99) (0.55–0.95)
Hispanic 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94
(0.74–1.27) (0.76–1.32) (0.74–1.30) (0.74–1.30) (0.71–1.24)
Asian 0.63c 0.65c 0.65c 0.64d 0.64c
(0.50–0.80) (0.52–0.83) (0.51–0.82) (0.50–0.82) (0.50–0.81)
Outcome: ≥ 2 falls in past year OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Non-Hispanic white Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Black 0.90 0.95 0.86 0.87 0.85
(0.64–1.27) (0.67–1.34) (0.60–1.24) (0.60–1.26) (0.59–1.23)
Hispanic 1.24 1.30 1.26 1.26 1.21
(0.87–1.77) (0.90–1.87) (0.87–1.83) (0.87–1.83) (0.83–1.76)
Asian 0.61d 0.63d 0.63d 0.62d 0.62d
(0.44–0.86) (0.45–0.90) (0.45–0.90) (0.43–0.88) (0.43–0.88)

OR adjusted odds ratio, 95% CI confidence interval around the adjusted odds ratio

aComorbidities include diabetes, arthritis and history of stroke

bSignificantly different from non-Hispanic white after controlling for age group using logistic regression at p < 0.05

cSignificantly different from non-Hispanic white after controlling for age group using logistic regression at p < 0.001

dSignificantly different from non-Hispanic white after controlling for age group using logistic regression at p ≤ 0.01