Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov 14;46(4):772–786. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0594-z

Table 2.

Summary Data of Model Fit for Measurement Models

Parameter Added df AIC Δχ2 RMSEA CFI SRMR
Model 1a – 32 4129.68 51.31* .08 .97 .07
Model 2 Negative Mood ~ Somatic Problems 31 4127.28   4.40* .07 .98 .07
Model 3 Negative SE ~ Tense/Restless 30 4123.23   6.05* .06 .98 .06
Model 4 Interpersonal ~ Humiliation/Rej 29 4121.38   3.89* .05 .99 .06
Model 5 Interpersonal ~ Performance Fear 28 4119.37   3.97* .04 .99 .06
Model 6 Ineffectiveness ~ Anxious Coping 27 4116.98   4.38* .02 1.00 .05

Note. AIC = Akaike Information Criteria, RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, CFI = Comparative Fit Index, SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual.

a

An initial measurement model revealed that perfectionism did not significantly load onto a latent variable representing anxiety. As a result, perfectionism was dropped from Model 1 and was not included in any subsequent measurement models.

*

p < .05