Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40352-017-0048-z

Table 3.

Baseline Age/Education-Adjusted Neurocognitive Data (N = 507)

MicroCog Subtest Scaled Scores Illegal Behavior/Criminal Justice Involvement Significance Between Groupsa
CJS-none (n = 331) CJS-Recommended (n = 69) CJ Mandated (n = 176)
Mean (SD) F-test, p value
Numbers Forward Total Score 8.41 (2.70) 8.94 (2.56) 8.94 (2.85) F (2, 503) = 2.49, p = .08
Numbers Reversed Total Score 7.90 (2.51) 8.88 (3.08) 8.41 (2.87) F (2, 503) = 4.60, p = .01b
Wordlist 1 Total Score 7.40 (4.59) 7.32 (4.58) 7.91 (4.18) F (2, 502) = 0.54, p = .59
Wordlist 2 Total Score 9.62 (3.17) 9.59 (3.33) 9.73 (3.29) F (2, 502) = 0.04, p = .96
Analogies Total Score 6.71 (2.90) 6.48 (2.57) 6.79 (2.92) F (2, 503) = 0.28, p = .75
Object Match A Total Score 8.30 (3.86) 8.42 (4.31) 8.08 (3.82) F (2, 499) = 0.19, p = .83
Object Match B Total Score 8.50 (3.16) 8.62 (3.37) 8.88 (2.95) F (2, 498) = 0.60, p = .55
Clocks Total Score 11.00 (1.85) 10.77 (2.04) 11.16 (1.71) F (2, 503) = 0.94, p = .39

a adjusted for baseline abstinence

b. Numbers reversed total scores is lower in CJS-none than CJS-recommended group. (t = 2.79, p < .01)