Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 3;52(2):634–655. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12513

Table 3.

Unadjusted Associations between Change in Primary Care Workforce and 2011 Outcomes

Results from Unadjusted Models (per Beneficiary)
Mortality Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions Total Emergency Department Visits
Risk Ratio 95% CI p‐value Risk Ratio 95% CI p‐value Risk Ratio 95% CI p‐value
Workforce measure
An increase of one primary care physicians per 10,000 populationa 1.001 (0.999–1.004) .329 0.987 (0.985–0.990) <0.05 1.002 (1.001–1.003) <.05
Based on 2001 U.S. average by increase 1 per 10,000 workforce Associated increase of 7.2 per 100,000 Associated reduction of 105.6 per 100,000 Associated increase of 72.0 per 100,000
An increase of one Medicare primary care full‐time equivalents per 10,000 beneficiariesb 0.997 (0.993–1.000) .058 1.021 (1.018–1.024) <0.05 1.005 (1.003–1.006) <.05
Based on 2001 U.S. average by increase 1 per 10,000 workforce Associated reduction of 18.0 per 100,000 Associated increase of 176.9 per 100,000 Associated increase of 179.4 per 100,000

To calculate associated change, for example, we applied the annual morality for 2001 of 5,610 per 100,000 from Table 1 to compute the reduction in the number of deaths per 100,000 as: 5,610*(1 − 1.001291) = −7.24 for per capita measure; 5,610*(1 − 0.996797) = 17.97 for full‐time equivalents measure.

The risk ratios show the direction of change.

If the value of risk ratio is >1, then adding workforce is associated with an increased outcome.

If the value of risk ratio is <1, then adding workforce is associated with a decreased outcome.

a

Age–sex‐adjusted office‐based American Medical Association Masterfile clinically active primary care physicians per 10,000 total population.

b

Age–sex–race‐adjusted office‐based primary care full‐time equivalents per 10,000 study beneficiaries.