Table 1.
“0‐1” Arm (n = 1,479)a | “0‐0” Arm (n = 3,365)b | “1‐0” Arm (n = 1,330)a | “1‐1” Arm (n = 2,979)b | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | PS‐Weighted | Unadjusted | PS‐Weighted | |||
Age | 7.7 (4.9) | 7.6 (4.9) | 7.8 (5.0) | 7.2 (4.9) | 7.3 (5.0) | 7.3 (5.1) |
Sex: female | 47.9 | 49.7 | 47.2 | 48.9 | 48.5 | 49.7 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||||
Hispanic | 15.3 | 24.6*** | 17.2 | 16.4 | 13.4** | 17.9 |
Non‐Hispanic black | 15.4 | 14.1*** | 15.5 | 12.1 | 12.2** | 12.3 |
Non‐Hispanic Asian | 1.9 | 4.1*** | 2.1 | 4.9 | 3.4** | 4.8 |
Non‐Hispanic other | 67.4 | 57.2*** | 65.2 | 66.6 | 71.0** | 65.0 |
Poverty level | ||||||
Poor | 19.6 | 23.1*** | 19.5 | 16.4 | 13.0* | 17.0 |
Near poor | 5.6 | 6.6*** | 5.9 | 5.5 | 4.3* | 5.8 |
Low income | 13.8 | 16.6*** | 14.9 | 11.9 | 13.1* | 13.1 |
Middle income | 32.1 | 30.9*** | 31.6 | 32.8 | 33.8* | 33.2 |
High income | 29.0 | 22.7*** | 28.1 | 33.4 | 35.9* | 31.0 |
Residence: urban | 85.6 | 83.1 | 85.1 | 83.2 | 89.6*** | 84.3 |
Insurance status | ||||||
Private | 60.9 | 49.3*** | 59.6 | 66.9 | 71.9*** | 64.1 |
Medicare/Medicaid | 30.8 | 38.7*** | 31.6 | 25.9 | 21.4*** | 28.8 |
Uninsured | 5.6 | 6.2*** | 5.2 | 5.8 | 4.2*** | 5.6 |
Unknown | 2.7 | 5.8*** | 3.6 | 1.5 | 2.4*** | 1.6 |
Special health care need | ||||||
Yes | 33.4 | 31.1 | 31.6 | 25.6 | 25.5 | 25.7 |
No | 65.4 | 68.2 | 67.3 | 73.7 | 73.9 | 73.4 |
Unknown | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
Perceived health | ||||||
Excellent | 49.6 | 43.3** | 51.0 | 50.5 | 57.8*** | 51.4 |
Very good | 29.8 | 31.7** | 28.9 | 29.4 | 28.3*** | 30.4 |
Good | 16.8 | 19.6** | 16.4 | 16.9 | 12.0*** | 15.3 |
Fair | 3.4 | 4.4** | 3.2 | 3.0 | 1.7*** | 2.7 |
Poor | 0.5 | 1.0** | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2*** | 0.2 |
Perceived mental health | ||||||
Excellent | 56.8 | 50.5* | 58.6 | 57.5 | 63.8*** | 57.8 |
Very good | 25.1 | 28.4* | 24.6 | 25.4 | 23.9*** | 25.2 |
Good | 13.9 | 17.2* | 13.8 | 13.8 | 11.0*** | 13.8 |
Fair | 3.1 | 3.2* | 2.5 | 2.7 | 1.1*** | 2.9 |
Poor | 1.0 | 0.8* | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3*** | 0.4 |
In estimating the average effect of the treated, the propensity score weighting does not change the sample mean of the treatment arm.
The unadjusted column is the regular sample means or proportions of survey data, and the PS‐weighted column is weighted mean or proportion where each subject is weighted by propensity score/(1 − propensity score). Differences between the control and treatment arms are tested by design‐based t‐tests for means and chi‐square tests for categorical variables.
Significance levels are denoted by ***p < .001, **p < .01, and *p < .05.