Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 3;52(2):786–806. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12512

Table 1.

Baseline Sample Characteristics (Mean and SD or Percentage) by Arms

“0‐1” Arm (n = 1,479)a “0‐0” Arm (n = 3,365)b “1‐0” Arm (n = 1,330)a “1‐1” Arm (n = 2,979)b
Unadjusted PS‐Weighted Unadjusted PS‐Weighted
Age 7.7 (4.9) 7.6 (4.9) 7.8 (5.0) 7.2 (4.9) 7.3 (5.0) 7.3 (5.1)
Sex: female 47.9 49.7 47.2 48.9 48.5 49.7
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic 15.3 24.6*** 17.2 16.4 13.4** 17.9
Non‐Hispanic black 15.4 14.1*** 15.5 12.1 12.2** 12.3
Non‐Hispanic Asian 1.9 4.1*** 2.1 4.9 3.4** 4.8
Non‐Hispanic other 67.4 57.2*** 65.2 66.6 71.0** 65.0
Poverty level
Poor 19.6 23.1*** 19.5 16.4 13.0* 17.0
Near poor 5.6 6.6*** 5.9 5.5 4.3* 5.8
Low income 13.8 16.6*** 14.9 11.9 13.1* 13.1
Middle income 32.1 30.9*** 31.6 32.8 33.8* 33.2
High income 29.0 22.7*** 28.1 33.4 35.9* 31.0
Residence: urban 85.6 83.1 85.1 83.2 89.6*** 84.3
Insurance status
Private 60.9 49.3*** 59.6 66.9 71.9*** 64.1
Medicare/Medicaid 30.8 38.7*** 31.6 25.9 21.4*** 28.8
Uninsured 5.6 6.2*** 5.2 5.8 4.2*** 5.6
Unknown 2.7 5.8*** 3.6 1.5 2.4*** 1.6
Special health care need
Yes 33.4 31.1 31.6 25.6 25.5 25.7
No 65.4 68.2 67.3 73.7 73.9 73.4
Unknown 1.3 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.9
Perceived health
Excellent 49.6 43.3** 51.0 50.5 57.8*** 51.4
Very good 29.8 31.7** 28.9 29.4 28.3*** 30.4
Good 16.8 19.6** 16.4 16.9 12.0*** 15.3
Fair 3.4 4.4** 3.2 3.0 1.7*** 2.7
Poor 0.5 1.0** 0.5 0.3 0.2*** 0.2
Perceived mental health
Excellent 56.8 50.5* 58.6 57.5 63.8*** 57.8
Very good 25.1 28.4* 24.6 25.4 23.9*** 25.2
Good 13.9 17.2* 13.8 13.8 11.0*** 13.8
Fair 3.1 3.2* 2.5 2.7 1.1*** 2.9
Poor 1.0 0.8* 0.4 0.3 0.3*** 0.4
a

In estimating the average effect of the treated, the propensity score weighting does not change the sample mean of the treatment arm.

b

The unadjusted column is the regular sample means or proportions of survey data, and the PS‐weighted column is weighted mean or proportion where each subject is weighted by propensity score/(1 − propensity score). Differences between the control and treatment arms are tested by design‐based t‐tests for means and chi‐square tests for categorical variables.

Significance levels are denoted by ***p < .001, **p < .01, and *p < .05.