Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;7(48):78918–78931. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12912

Table 2. Correlations between DDR2 expression and other important clinicopathological parameters in urothelial carcinomas.

Parameter Category Upper Carcinoma Urinary Tract Urothelial Urinary Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma
Case No. DDR2 Expression p-value Case No. DDR2 Expression p-value
Low High Low High
Gender Male 158 81 77 0.664 216 110 106 0.667
Female 182 89 93 79 38 41
Age (years) < 65 138 67 71 0.659 121 63 58 0.587
≥ 65 202 103 99 174 85 89
Tumor location Renal pelvis 141 63 78 0.250
Ureter 150 80 70
Renal pelvis & ureter 49 27 22
Multifocality Single 278 137 141 0.574
Multifocal 62 33 29
Primary tumor (T) Ta 89 60 29 < 0.001* 84 63 21 < 0.001*
T1 92 58 34 88 43 45
T2-T4 159 52 107 123 42 81
Nodal metastasis Negative (N0) 312 161 151 0.049* 266 136 130 0.319
Positive (N1-N2) 28 9 19 29 12 17
Histological grade Low grade 56 35 21 0.041* 56 44 12 < 0.001*
High grade 284 135 149 239 104 135
Pattern of Invasion Nodular 200 124 76 < 0.001* 137 87 50 < 0.001*
Trabecular 58 21 37 82 37 45
Infiltrative 82 25 57 76 24 52
Vascular invasion Absent 234 142 92 < 0.001* 246 135 111 < 0.001*
Present 106 28 78 49 13 36
Perineural invasion Absent 321 166 155 0.009* 275 142 133 0.062
Present 19 4 15 20 6 14
Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) < 10 173 96 77 0.039* 139 92 47 < 0.001*
>= 10 167 74 93 156 56 100
*

Statistically significant.