Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 12;7(48):79008–79016. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12592

Table 4. Associations between tertiles of dietary iron intake and breast cancer risk from multivariable cox proportional hazards models, stratified by antioxidant/placebo group of the SU.VI.MAX trial and by lipid intake,france, 1994–@2007a, b, c.

Placebo group Antioxidant supplementation group
N for cases/non-cases HR (95% CI) P-trend N for cases/non-cases HR (95% CI) P-trend
Total lipid intake < median (78.5 g/d) 0.1 0.3
 Tertile 1 20/632 1.00 21/602 1.00
 Tertile 2 18/338 1.58 (0.76, 3.24) 12/345 0.94 (0.41, 2.15)
 Tertile 3 12/143 1.99 (0.79, 4.99) 11/169 1.67 (0.63, 4.42)
Total lipid intake ≥ median (78.5 g/d) 0.046 0.2
 Tertile 1 5/140 1.00 7/121 1.00
 Tertile 2 15/413 1.41 (0.49, 4.06) 12/396 0.40 (0.15, 1.05)
 Tertile 3 30/576 2.57 (0.86, 7.68) 25/583 0.42 (0.15, 1.17)

CI, confidence interval, HR, Hazard ratio, SU.VI.MAX, Supplémentation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants

a

Multivariable models were adjusted for age (timescale), energy intake without alcohol, intervention group of the initial SU.VI.MAX trial, number of 24-h dietary records, smoking status, educational level, physical activity, height, BMI, alcohol intake, family history of breast cancer, lipids intake, use of hormone replacement therapy, and number of children.

b Cut-offs for tertiles of dietary iron intake were 9.3 and 11.9 mg/d.

c P for interaction between dietary iron and lipid intakes: Placebo group, 0.3; Antioxidant supplementation group, 0.5.