TABLE 6.
Distinct screeners used in studies assessing dietary intake in nonclinical, non-Aboriginal adult populations1
| Tool (or study/first author name affiliated with tool) | Study or reference numbers for research making use of the tool | Canada | United States | Not stated |
| Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire | 95, 96*† | x | ||
| CHAP tool | 214 | x | ||
| CaMOS study tool | CaMOS | x | ||
| CCHS Annual Cycles screener | 52,* 96,*† 223,* CCHS Annual Cycles | x | ||
| Diet History Questionnaire | 48* | x | ||
| Lucas et al. | 142 | x | ||
| Moubarac et al. | 157–159 | x | ||
| Owens et al. | 181 | x | ||
| Wu et al. tool | 74, 103, 106, 190, 203 | x | ||
| Williams et al. | 210 | x |
1
Citations and studies marked by an asterisk (*) indicate that the tool was modified for use in the study. Citations and studies marked by an asterisk (*) and by a superscript dagger (†) indicate that the tool was created by using items from multiple existing measures. Four studies used an unidentified screener (69, 90, 198, 208). The origin of these tools was not stated. CaMOS, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study; CCHS, Canadian Community Health Survey; CHAP, Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program.