TABLE 7.
Lessons learned from the folate and vitamin D NHANES crossover studies1
| Topic | Lessons learned |
| Folate | Use of HPLC-tandem MS method and comparison to international reference materials revealed systematic bias for BioRad radioassay |
| BioRad radioassay was stable over time and precise (<5% CV) and it showed a high correlation to the microbiological assay; this led to robust regression equation used to adjust data | |
| Several regression models were evaluated to find the best fit for the data, paying particular attention at the tails of the distribution where prevalence for low or high folate status is derived | |
| Relation between BioRad radioassay and microbiological assay varied by matrix | |
| Trending data over time needs to be based on adjusted assay data | |
| Vitamin D | DiaSorin radioassay shifted over time, masking the ability to monitor “true” population trends over time |
| Separate regression equations linking the DiaSorin radioassay and HPLC-tandem MS method had to be derived for different time periods | |
| Several regression models were evaluated to find the best fit for the data, paying particular attention at the tails of the distribution where prevalence for low or high vitamin D status is derived | |
| Use of in-house QC materials in each analytical run provided information on method shifts; this was used initially to QC-adjust the data and thus “smooth out” method shifts | |
| Trending data over time needs to be based on adjusted assay data |
QC, quality control.