Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2016 Oct 18;111(515):1075–1095. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1164052

Table 6.

Mean squared error of prediction (×10−2) for cluster-specific random effects based on six analyses described in Section 5.2, across six data scenarios given in Table 3. Throughout values are based on results from R=500 simulated datasets.

Scenario Weibull
-MVN
Weibull
-DPM
Weibull
-SF
PEM
-MVN
PEM
-DPM
Spline
-SF
%F %F
1 V1 5.25 5.27 6.40 17.8 5.27 5.27 6.39 0.2
V2 7.66 7.70 8.70 7.67 7.72 8.68
V3 9.91 9.95 12.13 9.91 9.96 12.11

2 V1 6.36 6.41 8.10 10.4 6.37 6.41 8.09 0.0
V2 8.76 8.85 10.23 8.77 8.86 10.20
V3 11.13 11.19 13.85 11.13 11.19 13.91

3 V1 5.03 5.04 6.27 15.8 5.04 5.04 6.22 0.0
V2 6.34 6.34 8.28 6.36 6.36 8.24
V3 7.55 7.49 11.66 7.57 7.55 11.69

4 V1 3.84 3.85 4.99 12.8 3.87 3.87 5.01 0.4
V2 6.25 6.27 7.19 6.25 6.27 7.12
V3 7.89 7.90 9.57 7.90 7.91 9.52

5 V1 6.95 6.26 10.87 12.8 6.96 6.27 10.86 0.2
V2 11.52 10.50 14.95 11.50 10.52 14.92
V3 15.46 14.66 25.04 15.46 14.72 24.94

6 V1 5.05 5.01 6.34 5.4 4.89 4.85 6.26 1.4
V2 7.58 7.55 8.60 7.41 7.39 8.49
V3 6.72 6.65 13.42 6.44 6.40 13.70

% of times SF models yield at least one of j being −∞, resulting in MSEP being ∞