Table 1. Characteristics of eligible studies in the meta-analysis.
Study | Year | Country | Study design | Tumor extenta | Histopathological subtype | Case number | Gender (M/F) | Age (years) | Counting method | Cut-off staining | follow-up (months) | Survival analysis | Quality score* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rioux-Leclercq | 2000 | France | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 73 | 47/26 | Mean 64 | eyeball | 20% | 52 | CSS | 8 |
Yuba | 2001 | Japan | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 52 | 43/9 | Mean 58.4 | eyeball | 5.6% | 39 | CSS | 7 |
Cheville | 2002 | USA | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC | 232 | NA | NA | formal counting | 5% | 126 | CSS | 8 |
Bui | 2004 | USA | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 224 | 149/75 | Mean 61.5 | formal counting | 10% | 34 | CSS | 8 |
Kim | 2004 | USA | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 318 | 215/103 | Mean 61 | eyeball | 15% | 28 | CSS | 8 |
Lehmann | 2004 | Germany | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC | 48 | 27/21 | Median 63 | eyeball | 6% | 91 | DFS | 6 |
Dudderidge | 2005 | UK | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC + non-ccRCC | 176 | 120/56 | Mean 63.7 | eyeball | 12% | 44 | DFS | 8 |
Kim | 2005 | USA | Cohort study | metastatic | ccRCC | 150 | 107/43 | Mean 59 | eyeball | NA | 14.8 | CSS | 6 |
Pinto | 2005 | Portugal | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC + non-ccRCC | 64 | 34/30 | Mean 61.6 | eyeball | 10% | 86 | OS | 6 |
Kankuri | 2006 | Finland | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC + non-ccRCC | 37 | 18/19 | Mean 62.2 | eyeball | 10% | 76 | OS,DFS | 6 |
Tollefson | 2007 | USA | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 741 | 475/266 | 358/383b (≥65 y/<65 y) | eyeball | ≥50 positive cells/mm2 | >39.6 | CSS | 9 |
Gontero | 2008 | Italy | Cohort study | all-stage | non-ccRCC | 46 | 37/9 | 28/18 (≥60 y/<60 y) | eyeball | 14% | 84.5 | OS | 8 |
Parker | 2009 | USA | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 634 | 413/221 | 312/322 (≥65 y/<65 y) | eyeball | ≥50 positive cells/mm2 | NA | CSS | 8 |
Zubac | 2009 | Norway | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC | 172 | 95/77 | Mean 66.6 | formal counting | 10% | 68.4 | CSS | 8 |
Kankuri-Tammilehto | 2010 | Finland | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC + non-ccRCC | 57 | NA | Mean 61 | eyeball | 10% | >100 | OS | 6 |
Weber | 2013 | Germany | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC | 132 | 80/52 | Median 63.5 | eyeball | 15% | 122.4 | CSS | 8 |
Gayed | 2014 | USA | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC | 401 | 239/162 | Median 58 | eyeball | 10% | 22 | DFS,CSS | 8 |
Teng | 2014 | China | Cohort study | localized | ccRCC | 378 | 272/106 | Mean 53.4 | NA | 50% | 60 | DFS | 8 |
Zheng | 2014 | China | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC + non-ccRCC | 1239 | 858/381 | 53.9 | eyeball | 15% | 56.8 | DFS | 8 |
Virman | 2016 | Findland | Cohort study | all-stage | ccRCC + non-ccRCC | 224 | 132/92 | Median 65 | formal counting | Median staining | 64.8 | OS | 9 |
ccRCC: clear cell renal cell carcinoma; OS: overall survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; DFS: disease-free survival; NA: not available.
aReported at time of diagnosis.
b358 patients ≥ 65 years, and other 383 patients < 65 years.
*The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.