Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;7:44281. doi: 10.1038/srep44281

Table 1. Characteristics of eligible studies in the meta-analysis.

Study Year Country Study design Tumor extenta Histopathological subtype Case number Gender (M/F) Age (years) Counting method Cut-off staining follow-up (months) Survival analysis Quality score*
Rioux-Leclercq 2000 France Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 73 47/26 Mean 64 eyeball 20% 52 CSS 8
Yuba 2001 Japan Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 52 43/9 Mean 58.4 eyeball 5.6% 39 CSS 7
Cheville 2002 USA Cohort study localized ccRCC 232 NA NA formal counting 5% 126 CSS 8
Bui 2004 USA Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 224 149/75 Mean 61.5 formal counting 10% 34 CSS 8
Kim 2004 USA Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 318 215/103 Mean 61 eyeball 15% 28 CSS 8
Lehmann 2004 Germany Cohort study localized ccRCC 48 27/21 Median 63 eyeball 6% 91 DFS 6
Dudderidge 2005 UK Cohort study localized ccRCC + non-ccRCC 176 120/56 Mean 63.7 eyeball 12% 44 DFS 8
Kim 2005 USA Cohort study metastatic ccRCC 150 107/43 Mean 59 eyeball NA 14.8 CSS 6
Pinto 2005 Portugal Cohort study all-stage ccRCC + non-ccRCC 64 34/30 Mean 61.6 eyeball 10% 86 OS 6
Kankuri 2006 Finland Cohort study localized ccRCC + non-ccRCC 37 18/19 Mean 62.2 eyeball 10% 76 OS,DFS 6
Tollefson 2007 USA Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 741 475/266 358/383b (≥65 y/<65 y) eyeball ≥50 positive cells/mm2 >39.6 CSS 9
Gontero 2008 Italy Cohort study all-stage non-ccRCC 46 37/9 28/18 (≥60 y/<60 y) eyeball 14% 84.5 OS 8
Parker 2009 USA Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 634 413/221 312/322 (≥65 y/<65 y) eyeball ≥50 positive cells/mm2 NA CSS 8
Zubac 2009 Norway Cohort study all-stage ccRCC 172 95/77 Mean 66.6 formal counting 10% 68.4 CSS 8
Kankuri-Tammilehto 2010 Finland Cohort study all-stage ccRCC + non-ccRCC 57 NA Mean 61 eyeball 10% >100 OS 6
Weber 2013 Germany Cohort study localized ccRCC 132 80/52 Median 63.5 eyeball 15% 122.4 CSS 8
Gayed 2014 USA Cohort study localized ccRCC 401 239/162 Median 58 eyeball 10% 22 DFS,CSS 8
Teng 2014 China Cohort study localized ccRCC 378 272/106 Mean 53.4 NA 50% 60 DFS 8
Zheng 2014 China Cohort study all-stage ccRCC + non-ccRCC 1239 858/381 53.9 eyeball 15% 56.8 DFS 8
Virman 2016 Findland Cohort study all-stage ccRCC + non-ccRCC 224 132/92 Median 65 formal counting Median staining 64.8 OS 9

ccRCC: clear cell renal cell carcinoma; OS: overall survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; DFS: disease-free survival; NA: not available.

aReported at time of diagnosis.

b358 patients ≥ 65 years, and other 383 patients < 65 years.

*The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.