Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Apr;44(4):249–254. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000583

Table 2.

Partner Services Indices for Early Syphilis in King County, WA 2010-2014

*Partner Services
Indices
In-person
Interview
N=682

Counts
Index
Telephone
Interview
N=646

Counts
Index
**Unadjusted
Relative Risk
(95% CI)
P-
value
***Adjusted
Relative Risk
(95% CI)
P-
value
Contact index 2340
3.43
1329
2.06
1.67
(1.56, 1.78)

<0.001
1.68
(1.55, 1.82)

<0.001
Notification
Index
1155
1.70
724
1.13
1.51
(1.38, 1.66)

<0.001
1.39
(1.24, 1.56)

<0.001
Syphilis test
index
786
1.15
463
0.72
1.61
(1.43, 1.80)

<0.001
1.34
(1.16, 1.54)

<0.001
HIV test index 355
0.52
131
0.20
2.57
(2.10, 3.14)

<0.001
1.45
(1.14, 1.86)

0.003
Epidemiologic
index
703
1.03
477
0.74
1.40
(1.24, 1.57)

<0.001
1.19
(1.03, 1.37)

0.017
Syphilis case-
finding index
193
0.28
162
0.25
1.13
(0.92, 1.39)
0.257 0.91
(0.71, 1.17)

0.470
HIV case-finding
index
14
0.02
5
0.01
2.65
(0.96, 7.36)

0.061
1.83
(0.56, 5.95)

0.316
Brought-to-
treatment index
189
0.28
153
0.24
1.17
(0.95, 1.45)

0.149
0.93
(0.72, 1.21)

0.600

HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus

*

All indices have a denominator of total original patients interviewed (N). Numerators are:

Contact index: Partners named

Notification index: Partners notified

Syphilis test index: Partners tested for syphilis

HIV test index: Partners tested for HIV

Epidemiology index: Partners empirically treated for syphilis

Syphilis case-finding index: Partners diagnosed with syphilis

HIV case-finding index: Partners diagnosed with HIV

Brought-to-treatment index: Partners diagnosed with and treated for syphilis

**

Unadjusted Poisson regression model

***

Multivariable Poisson regression model adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, HIV status, time from diagnosis to interview, place of diagnosis, and disease intervention specialist who performed the interview.