Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Apr;44(4):249–254. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000583

Table 4.

Partner Services Indices for New HIV Diagnoses in King County, WA 2010-2014

*Partner
Services Indices
In-person
Interview
N=358

Counts
Index
Telephone
Interview
N=489

Counts
Index
**Unadjusted
Relative Risk
(95% CI)
P-
value
***Adjusted
Relative Risk
(95% CI)
P-
value
Contact index 670
1.87
628
1.28
1.46
(1.31, 1.62)

<0.001
1.38
(1.18, 1.62)

<0.001
Notification
Index
495
1.38
448
0.92
1.51
(1.33, 1.71)

<0.001
1.24
(1.03, 1.50)

0.026
HIV test index 219
0.61
235
0.48
1.27
(1.06,1.53)

0.010
1.15
(0.88, 1.52)

0.303
HIV case-finding
index
36
0.10
24
0.05
2.05
(1.22, 3.43)

0.006
2.17
(1.04,4.50)

0.039

HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus

*

All indices have a denominator of total original patients interviewed (N). Numerators are:

Contact index: Partners named

Notification index: Partners notified

HIV test index: Partners tested for HIV

HIV case-finding index: Partners diagnosed with HIV

**

Unadjusted Poisson regression model

***

Multivariable regression model adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, time from diagnosis to interview, place of diagnosis, and disease intervention specialist who performed the interview.