Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 15;114(10):2759–2764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619252114

Fig. S11.

Fig. S11.

Rescue of tan1 mutant phenotype using D-TAN1-13–YFP after 3 wk of growth. (A) Sibling plants (from left to right) wild type, tan1 D-TAN1-13, wild-type D-TAN1-13, tan1. (B) Shoot wet weight for wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 is not significantly different (KS test, P = 0.5455). (C) Root wet weight for wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 is not significantly different (KS test, P = 0.3283). (D) Leaf 1 measurements for sheath height, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.1667); however, length is significantly different (KS test, P = 0.0303). (E) Leaf 2 measurements for sheath height, length, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.0909). (F) Leaf 3 measurements for sheath height, length, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.1414). (G) Leaf 4 measurements for sheath height, length, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.0909). (H) Leaf 5 measurements for sheath height, length, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.4343). (I) Leaf 6 measurements for sheath height, length, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.0909). (J) Leaf 7 measurements for sheath height, length, area, and area/length are not different between wild-type and tan1 D-TAN1-13 (KS test, P > 0.3283).