Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 14;7(50):82254–82265. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12672

Table 2. Predictive effects of the E2F score in resected lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Overall survival No ACT With ACT
N Median survival 5-year
Survival rate (%)
N Median survival 5-year
Survival rate (%)
Log-rank test
p-value
HR** (95% CI) ACT vs No ACT Int-P***
Individual cohorts:
JBR10.AD[22]: Fresh Frozen
 Low E2F group (N=48) 21 NR* 71 27 72.4 66 0.154 1.92 (0.77, 4.77) 0.016
 High E2F group (N=23) 11 36.4 22 12 73.1 75 0.043 0.31 (0.1, 1.01)
NATCH[7]: FFPE
 Low E2F group (N=23) 13 81.5 69 10 NR 51 0.631 1.4 (0.35, 5.64) 0.407
 High E2F group (N=51) 27 25.1 20 24 65.6 52 0.162 0.61 (0.3, 1.23)
Combined cohorts (JBR10.AD and NATCH):
All stages
 Low E2F group (N=71) 34 NR 70 37 72.4 63 0.195 1.62 (0.78, 3.36) 0.016
 High E2F group (N=74) 38 25.1 20 36 69.7 60 0.023 0.51 (0.28, 0.92)
Stage I
 Low E2F group (N=46) 24 NR 83 22 NR 77 0.202 2.05 (0.67, 6.28) 0.184
 High E2F group (N=34) 18 48.5 31 16 73.1 61 0.526 0.75 (0.30, 1.85)
Stage II
 Low E2F group (N=20) 7 73.2 57 13 57.8 41 0.466 1.55 (0.47, 5.13) 0.015
 High E2F group (N=22) 11 18 18 11 NR 81 0.012 0.21 (0.06, 0.80)
Stage III/IV
Low E2F group (N=5) 3 22.8 0 2 22.5 ≤50 0.455 0.43 (0.04, 4.20) 0.74
 High E2F group (N=18) 9 17.6 0 9 20.3 33 0.302 0.57 (0.20, 1.65)

NR*: median survival time not reached within the study

HR**: hazard ratio

Int-P***: P value of interaction effect

Significant P values are in bold text