Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 8;7(50):82440–82449. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12517

Table 5. Performance comparison of the RVMBIGP and the other methods on yeast dataset.

Model Ac (%) Sp (%) Sn (%) Mcc (%)
SLIPPER [7] 71.90 72.18 69.72 28.42
DXECPPI [10] 87.46 94.93 29.44 28.25
PPIevo [4] 66.28 87.46 60.14 18.01
LocFuse [11] 66.66 68.10 55.49 15.77
CRS [1] 72.69 74.37 59.58 23.68
SPAR [1] 76.96 80.02 53.24 24.84
Proposed method 95.48 98.37 72.86 77.14