. 2016 Nov 19;30(3):501–511. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13007

Table 1.

Relative expression levels and fold increase for the used immune genes divided by the different treatment groups

Gene	Flight treatment	Immune treatment	Relative expression difference (log2)	Fold increase	SE	P
Lysozyme	Control	PBS	0.46	1.38	0.24	0.94
AIC = 414.58; R ² = 0.03	Control	Bacteria	−0.02	0.99	0.49	1.0
	Flight	Naïve	0.49	1.40	0.3	0.91
		PBS	0.62	1.54	0.29	0.79
		Bacteria	0.14	1.10	0.31	0.99
β‐1,3‐glucan recognition protein	Control	PBS	1.29	2.45	0.35	0.12
AIC = 418.84; R ² = 0.7	Control	Bacteria	4.48	22.32	0.27	< 0.00001
	Flight	Naïve	1.46	2.75	0.3	0.049
		PBS	1.67	3.18	0.25	0.02
		Bacteria	4.71	26.17	0.44	< 0.00001
proPO	Control	PBS	0.32	1.25	0.26	0.99
AIC = 419.61; R ² = 0.06	Control	Bacteria	1.28	2.43	0.45	0.11
	Flight	Naïve	0.47	1.39	0.24	0.94
		PBS	0.1	1.07	0.29	0.99
		Bacteria	0.45	1.37	0.26	0.99
Serpin	Control	PBS	0.5	1.41	0.22	0.92
AIC = 421.55; R ² = 0.13	Control	Bacteria	1.29	2.45	0.49	0.11
	Flight	Naïve	0.29	1.22	0.49	0.99
		PBS	0.9	1.87	0.12	0.47
		Bacteria	1.66	3.16	0.2	0.01

Attacin	Control	PBS	6.41	85.04	0.52	< 0.00001
AIC = 572.59; R ² = 0.53	Control	Bacteria	9.08	541.19	0.73	< 0.00001
	Flight	Naïve	2.99	7.94	0.77	0.04
		PBS	4.26	19.16	0.66	0.001
		Bacteria	8.18	290.02	0.85	< 0.00001
Pelle	Control	PBS	1.22	2.33	0.24	0.16
AIC = 423.07; R ² = 0.53	Control	Bacteria	4.65	25.11	0.37	< 0.00001
	Flight	Naïve	1.9	3.73	0.32	0.003
		PBS	2.61	6.11	0.46	< 0.0001
		Bacteria	3.82	14.12	0.32	< 0.00001
PGRP‐LC	Control	PBS	0.73	1.66	0.12	0.14
AIC = 312.23.07; R ² = 0.14	Control	Bacteria	0.66	1.58	0.25	0.22
	Flight	Naïve	0.81	1.75	0.18	0.07
		PBS	0.93	1.91	0.15	0.02
		Bacteria	0.72	1.65	0.18	0.14

Expression levels are calibrated to naïve individuals without flight treatment, and sexes are pooled. Significant effects are highlighted in bold and calculated with Post hoc analysis (Tukey honest significant differences).