Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 17;25(1):34–41. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12334

Table 4.

Comparing lung function (FEV1), body mass index (BMI) and P. aeruginosa colonisation across socio‐economic categories (SEIFA quintiles) and remoteness (ASGC classification) categories

n (%) FEV1 (l) BMI (kg m−2) Ps Aer ≥2
Socio‐economic status – SEIFA (Disadvantage) categories
Binary
1, 2 and 3 (Most disadvantaged) 194 (55.8%) 1.82 (1.41–2.62) 17.7 (16.0–20.1) 69 (35.6%)
4 and 5 (Least disadvantaged) 154 (44.2%) 2.06 (1.48–2.76) 18.3 (16.2–19.9) 29 (24.0%)
P = 0.39 P = 0.37 P = 0.02
Remoteness (ASGC categories)
Major cities 136 (41.1%) 1.90 (1.38–2.65) 17.34 (15.76–19.86) 40 (30.2%)
Inner Regional 144 (43.5%) 2.04 (1.48–2.62) 18.2 (16.36–19.91) 46 (30.3%)
Outer regional – very remote 51 (15.4%) 1.96 (1.42–2.95) 17.89 (15.56–20.42) 17 (32.7%)
P = 0.69 P = 0.77 P = 0.76

Medians (M) and interquartile ranges (IQR) reported in brackets, unless otherwise stated. The P‐value is for any statistically significant difference in clinical outcome measures between the two of the groups of SES and Remoteness categories. ASGC, Australian Standard for Geographical Classification; BMI, body mass index; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; Ps Aer≥2, two or more positive cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa; SEIFA, Socio‐economic index for area (disadvantage); SES, Socio‐economic status.