Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 4;52(2):136–144. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12292

Table 1.

Measurement invariance tests for meta‐perceptions

Model χ2 (df) χ2/df Δχ2 (Δdf) CFI (ΔCFI) Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI) RMSEA Comparison Decision
Model 1: configural 336.51 (156) 2.157 .939 .918 .073 Accept
Model 2: metric invariance 377.71 (171) 2.208 41.20 (15) .930 (−.009) .914 .075 Model 1 vs. Model 2 Accept
Model 3a: full scalar invariance 912.37 (186) 4.905 534.66 (15) .754 (−.176) .723 .134 Model 2 vs. Model 3a Reject
Model 3b: partial scalar invariance 409.22 (179) 2.286 31.51 (8) .922 (−.008) .909 .077 Model 2 vs. Model 3b Accept